EFV vs. BKIE
EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFV tracks the MSCI EAFE Value Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFV returned 12.07%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for BKIE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
EFV vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.46% return.
EFV
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
EFV vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 9.13% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | 34.24% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFV and BKIE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EFV and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFV vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFV
BKIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
EFV
BKIE
Industrials
EFV
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
EFV
BKIE
Basic Materials
EFV
BKIE
Healthcare
EFV
BKIE
Energy
EFV
BKIE
Utilities
EFV
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
EFV
BKIE
Communication Services
EFV
BKIE
Technology
EFV
BKIE
Real Estate
EFV
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFV vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
EFV
BKIE
EFV vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.99 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 7.68 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.56 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.56 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.92 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
EFV vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -28.19% | -35.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -11.41% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.72% | -13.19% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.84% | -28.19% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -1.33% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -4.98% | -9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.95% | -0.04% |
Volatility
EFV vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFV | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.42% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 12.17% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 14.58% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 16.12% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 16.34% | +1.52% |
EFV vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFV vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than BKIE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.81% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, EFV and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, EFV leads with 12.07% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFV has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.
EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.04% for BKIE.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFV and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer