PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EFV vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EFV vs. BKIE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFV tracks the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net) while BKIE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFV returned 14.34%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for BKIE. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EFV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.

Performance

EFV vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 16.57% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 12.14% return.

EFV

1D
0.26%
1M
4.16%
6M
9.61%
YTD
16.57%
1Y
34.58%
3Y*
23.11%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
10.51%
ALL TIME*
6.15%

BKIE

1D
0.38%
1M
1.67%
6M
6.74%
YTD
12.14%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BKIE

BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
$7.46M$7.01M$6.05M

EFV

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
$246.44M$344.02M$395.70M

EFV vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF		16.57%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%35.44%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF		12.14%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and BKIE is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.94

The correlation between EFV and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EFV
BKIE

Financial Services

38.8%
26.6%

Industrials

10.0%
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
6.3%

Healthcare

7.6%
9.1%

Energy

6.2%
5.0%

Utilities

6.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.0%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
7.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
4.1%

Technology

3.1%
11.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

EFV
38.8%
BKIE
26.6%

Industrials

EFV
10.0%
BKIE
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
9.8%
BKIE
6.3%

Healthcare

EFV
7.6%
BKIE
9.1%

Energy

EFV
6.2%
BKIE
5.0%

Utilities

EFV
6.1%
BKIE
3.5%

Basic Materials

EFV
6.0%
BKIE
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
5.6%
BKIE
7.2%

Communication Services

EFV
4.1%
BKIE
4.1%

Technology

EFV
3.1%
BKIE
11.7%

Real Estate

EFV
2.7%
BKIE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

BNY Mellon International Equity ETF

Often compared with EFV:
EFV vs. VEAEFV vs. EFAVEFV vs. FIVAEFV vs. VOOEFV vs. DFIVXEFV vs. VTRIXEFV vs. SCHF
Often compared with BKIE:
BKIE vs. VXUSBKIE vs. BKEMBKIE vs. VEABKIE vs. SPDWBKIE vs. IDHQBKIE vs. IQLTBKIE vs. VGPMX

Return for Risk

EFV vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFV vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EFVBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
1.75

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.32
2.47

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.34

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

9.09

+2.81

EFV vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFV vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and BKIE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EFVBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-28.19%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-11.41%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-13.19%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-28.19%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.32%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-4.88%

-9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.93%

-0.02%

Volatility

EFV vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) is 3.85%, while BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that EFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EFVBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.12%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

12.98%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

15.24%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

16.22%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

16.32%

+1.14%

EFV vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFV vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BKIE's 3.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF		3.14%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF		4.51%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, EFV and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKIE has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to EFV (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, EFV leads with 14.34% vs 9.84% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFV has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.14% for BKIE.

EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net), while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for EFV and 0.04% for BKIE.

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer