PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFV vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFV vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFV achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.46% return.


EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFV vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%34.24%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EFV and BKIE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.94

The correlation between EFV and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFV vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFV
BKIE

Financial Services

36.9%
25.8%

Industrials

10.2%
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
6.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
7.2%

Healthcare

7.2%
9.1%

Energy

7.0%
5.9%

Utilities

5.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
7.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
4.2%

Technology

4.3%
10.1%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.0%

Financial Services

EFV
36.9%
BKIE
25.8%

Industrials

EFV
10.2%
BKIE
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFV
8.3%
BKIE
6.2%

Basic Materials

EFV
7.5%
BKIE
7.2%

Healthcare

EFV
7.2%
BKIE
9.1%

Energy

EFV
7.0%
BKIE
5.9%

Utilities

EFV
5.9%
BKIE
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFV
4.8%
BKIE
7.3%

Communication Services

EFV
4.4%
BKIE
4.2%

Technology

EFV
4.3%
BKIE
10.1%

Real Estate

EFV
2.5%
BKIE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFV vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFV vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFVBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.99

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

7.68

+1.90

EFV vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFV and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFVBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.56

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.56

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.92

-0.65

Drawdowns

EFV vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFV drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFV and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFVBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.94%

-28.19%

-35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-11.41%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.72%

-13.19%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.84%

-28.19%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-1.33%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-4.98%

-9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.95%

-0.04%

Volatility

EFV vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFVBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.42%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

12.17%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

14.58%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

16.12%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.34%

+1.52%

EFV vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFV vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

EFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EFV and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFV dropped -63.94% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, EFV leads with 12.07% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFV has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.26% for BKIE.

EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EFV and 0.04% for BKIE.

EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFV and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer