EFU vs. MUU
EFU (ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EFU tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. EFU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
EFU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EFU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -15.54%
- 1Y
- -29.84%
- 3Y*
- -24.30%
- 5Y*
- -15.33%
- 10Y*
- -20.43%
MUU
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 2.66% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFU and MUU is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
EFU
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFU drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFU and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.37% | -26.63% | -72.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -26.63% | -72.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.15% | -12.91% | -74.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.43% | — | — |
Volatility
EFU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFU | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.33% | 263.57% | -231.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 263.57% | -229.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.65% | 263.57% | -229.92% |
EFU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
EFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE | 5.40% | 5.57% | 3.87% | 6.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.95% | 0.17% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFU and MUU have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.
EFU has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.
EFU tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFU and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for EFU and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer