EFRA vs. FIDU
EFRA (iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - EFRA tracks the FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index while FIDU tracks the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFRA returned 11.21%/yr vs 22.62%/yr for FIDU. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
EFRA vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than FIDU's 14.93% return.
EFRA
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 10.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIDU
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
EFRA vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 4.96% | 13.76% | 8.09% | 14.49% | 7.48% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 14.93% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFRA and FIDU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EFRA and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFRA vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFRA
FIDU
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
EFRA
FIDU
Utilities
EFRA
FIDU
Consumer Cyclical
EFRA
FIDU
Basic Materials
EFRA
FIDU
Technology
EFRA
FIDU
Communication Services
EFRA
-
FIDU
Consumer Defensive
EFRA
-
FIDU
-
Energy
EFRA
-
FIDU
Financial Services
EFRA
-
FIDU
Healthcare
EFRA
-
FIDU
Real Estate
EFRA
-
FIDU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFRA vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
EFRA
FIDU
EFRA vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 2.20 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 9.09 | -6.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.64 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.66 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EFRA vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -42.31% | +26.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -12.23% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | -20.52% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -1.27% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -4.81% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.96% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EFRA vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) is 4.37%, while Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that EFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 5.27% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 13.52% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 16.50% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 18.27% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 20.31% | -4.80% |
EFRA vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFRA vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than FIDU's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 4.13% | 4.34% | 3.79% | 1.85% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFRA and FIDU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIDU has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to EFRA (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFRA dropped -16.25% vs FIDU's -42.31%.
On 3-year performance, FIDU leads with 22.62% vs 11.21% for EFRA. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 22.62% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EFRA.
EFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.
EFRA tracks FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index, while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EFRA and 0.08% for FIDU.
FIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFRA and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer