EFRA vs. EAGG
EFRA (iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF) and EAGG (iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFRA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index, while EAGG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EFRA returned 10.23%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for EAGG. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFRA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EAGG.
Performance
EFRA vs. EAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFRA achieves a 5.58% return, which is significantly higher than EAGG's 0.54% return.
EFRA
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAGG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
EFRA vs. EAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 5.58% | 13.76% | 8.09% | 14.49% | 8.75% |
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.54% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 5.58% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFRA and EAGG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFRA vs. EAGG — Risk / Return Rank
EFRA
EAGG
EFRA vs. EAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFRA | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.79 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 5.28 | -2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFRA vs. EAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFRA drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum EAGG drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFRA and EAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFRA | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -18.74% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -2.75% | -8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | -6.20% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -2.53% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -6.03% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 0.93% | +3.15% |
Volatility
EFRA vs. EAGG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF (EFRA) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) at 1.26%. This indicates that EFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFRA | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 1.26% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 2.73% | +8.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 3.72% | +10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 6.03% | +9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 5.49% | +10.09% |
EFRA vs. EAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFRA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EAGG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFRA vs. EAGG - Dividend Comparison
EFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than EAGG's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% |
EFRA iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF | 5.13% | 4.34% | 3.79% | 1.85% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFRA and EAGG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFRA has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to EAGG (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFRA dropped -16.25% vs EAGG's -18.74%.
On 3-year performance, EFRA leads with 10.23% vs 3.92% for EAGG. On fees, EAGG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EFRA has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAGG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EFRA.
EFRA has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.00% for EAGG.
EFRA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while EAGG is Intermediate Core Bond. EFRA tracks FTSE Green Revenues Select Infrastructure and Industrials Index, while EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EFRA and 0.10% for EAGG.
EAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFRA and EAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer