EFR vs. QQQH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EFR (Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust) is a stock, while QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos. Over the past 5 years, EFR returned 3.34%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for QQQH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EFR vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 5.58% return.

EFR

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -1.26%
• 1Y: -4.05%
• 3Y*: 6.92%
• 5Y*: 3.34%
• 10Y*: 5.97%

QQQH

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -1.35%
• YTD: 5.58%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 15.33%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFR vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	-1.84%	-4.85%	11.32%	29.25%	-18.73%	22.88%	0.83%	2.88%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	5.58%	14.17%	25.98%	30.96%	-28.35%	9.76%	18.62%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EFR and QQQH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019	0.30

Return for Risk

EFR vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFR

EFR Risk / Return Rank: 24
EFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
EFR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
EFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 50
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFR vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFR	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.44	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.68	1.97	-2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.27	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	2.21	-2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.72	9.17	-9.89

EFR vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFR and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFR vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.55%, which is greater than QQQH's maximum drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and QQQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFR	QQQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.55%	-31.24%	-29.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-6.96%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.30%	-15.18%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.07%	-31.24%	+6.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.88%	-2.18%	-8.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.01%	-8.21%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.61%	1.68%	+3.93%

Volatility

EFR vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) is 1.88%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that EFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFR	QQQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	5.16%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	8.54%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	10.71%	-2.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.06%	13.35%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	13.45%	+1.48%

Dividends

EFR vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, less than QQQH's 9.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust	8.87%	9.53%	9.76%	10.37%	10.39%	5.62%	6.39%	7.34%	7.46%	5.42%	5.82%	6.95%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	9.01%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFR and QQQH in my portfolio?

EFR and QQQH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFR or QQQH?

QQQH has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to EFR (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFR dropped -60.55% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.