EFR vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Performance
EFR vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFR vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | -3.43% | -4.85% | 11.32% | 29.25% | -18.73% | 22.88% | 0.83% | 16.43% | -6.96% | 3.37% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 8.51% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Fundamentals
EFR:
$93.95M
KGC:
$7.06B
EFR:
$86.69M
KGC:
$3.48B
EFR:
$109.68M
KGC:
$4.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EFR has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 6.12%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.
EFR
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
KGC
- 1D
- 6.71%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 143.53%
- 3Y*
- 89.08%
- 5Y*
- 36.79%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
EFR
KGC
EFR vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFR | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | 2.87 | -3.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | 2.89 | -3.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.42 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 4.83 | -5.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 17.11 | -18.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFR | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 2.87 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.85 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.54 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.08 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR and KGC is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EFR vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.51%, more than KGC's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust | 9.51% | 9.53% | 9.76% | 10.37% | 10.39% | 5.62% | 6.39% | 7.34% | 7.46% | 5.42% | 5.82% | 6.95% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.44% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFR vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.55%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and KGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.55% | -96.00% | +35.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -30.20% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -61.44% | +36.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | -67.75% | +25.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.32% | -19.73% | +7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -57.85% | +48.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 8.52% | -3.81% |
Volatility
EFR vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) is 4.82%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 17.82%. This indicates that EFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFR | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 17.82% | -13.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 40.92% | -34.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 50.25% | -37.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 43.55% | -30.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 47.66% | -32.71% |
Financials
EFR vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities