EFR.TO vs. CBOE
EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) and CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy), while CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EFR.TO returned 18.46%/yr vs 17.66%/yr for CBOE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFR.TO is traded in CAD, while CBOE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBOE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFR.TO achieves a -19.82% return, which is significantly lower than CBOE's 17.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFR.TO having a 18.46% annualized return and CBOE not far behind at 17.66%.
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -5.51%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- 6M
- -54.30%
- YTD
- -19.82%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.02%
- 10Y*
- 18.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.62%
CBOE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.22%
- 5Y*
- 23.25%
- 10Y*
- 17.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$410.14M | CA$474.18M | CA$578.48M | |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | CA$9.41M | CA$9.92M | CA$17.75M |
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | -19.82% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 17.40% | 24.03% | 20.12% | 40.93% | 4.04% | 42.16% | -23.04% | 19.04% | -13.92% | 58.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFR.TO and CBOE is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2010 | 0.05 |
The correlation between EFR.TO and CBOE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFR.TO:
CA$3.98B
CBOE:
$29.83B
EFR.TO:
-$0.29
CBOE:
$11.77
EFR.TO:
31.80
CBOE:
6.24
EFR.TO:
3.78
CBOE:
5.57
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
CBOE:
$4.79B
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
CBOE:
$2.50B
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
CBOE:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFR.TO vs. CBOE — Risk / Return Rank
EFR.TO
CBOE
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) and Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFR.TO | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.62 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 2.07 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than CBOE's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR.TO and CBOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFR.TO | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -39.92% | -59.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.55% | -34.69% | -22.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.28% | -34.69% | -24.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.59% | -34.69% | -29.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.32% | -38.41% | -39.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.04% | -20.13% | -73.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.83% | -11.00% | -80.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.92% | 10.33% | +20.59% |
Volatility
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Volatility Comparison
Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) at 10.86%. This indicates that EFR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFR.TO | CBOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.09% | 10.86% | +5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.77% | 28.56% | +34.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.57% | 31.59% | +63.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.69% | 24.97% | +46.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.89% | 26.58% | +44.31% |
Dividends
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Dividend Comparison
EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Fuels Inc. and Cboe Global Markets, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFR.TO vs. CBOE - Profitability Comparison
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
CBOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.
CBOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
CBOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFR.TO and CBOE have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFR.TO and CBOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer