EFOR vs. ON
EFOR (Everforth, Inc.) and ON (ON Semiconductor Corporation) are both stocks. EFOR operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while ON operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EFOR returned -2.25%/yr vs 23.72%/yr for ON. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EFOR vs. ON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFOR achieves a -40.96% return, which is significantly lower than ON's 50.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EFOR has underperformed ON with an annualized return of -2.25%, while ON has yielded a comparatively higher 23.72% annualized return.
EFOR
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 61.04%
- 6M
- -45.40%
- YTD
- -40.96%
- 1Y
- -41.48%
- 3Y*
- -28.42%
- 5Y*
- -22.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.31%
ON
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -10.53%
- 6M
- 36.27%
- YTD
- 50.71%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- -8.94%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | $27.62M | $22.21M | $22.74M |
| $734.43M | $864.80M | $1.33B |
EFOR vs. ON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFOR Everforth, Inc. | -40.96% | -42.20% | -13.34% | 18.03% | -33.97% | 47.73% | 17.70% | 30.22% | -15.20% | 45.54% |
ON ON Semiconductor Corporation | 50.71% | -14.12% | -24.52% | 33.93% | -8.17% | 107.52% | 34.25% | 47.67% | -21.16% | 64.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFOR and ON is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2000 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EFOR and ON shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFOR:
$1.17B
ON:
$31.76B
EFOR:
$1.96
ON:
$1.43
EFOR:
14.49
ON:
57.11
EFOR:
0.30
ON:
5.40
EFOR:
0.65
ON:
4.40
EFOR:
$3.97B
ON:
$6.06B
EFOR:
$1.11B
ON:
$2.26B
EFOR:
$280.70M
ON:
$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFOR vs. ON — Risk / Return Rank
EFOR
ON
EFOR vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFOR | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.09 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 3.12 | -4.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFOR vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFOR drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ON drawdown of -96.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFOR and ON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFOR | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.98% | -96.34% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.55% | -41.12% | -27.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.72% | -69.16% | -14.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.00% | -70.44% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.00% | -70.44% | -16.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.33% | -39.07% | -39.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -53.78% | +14.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.38% | 14.40% | +21.98% |
Volatility
EFOR vs. ON - Volatility Comparison
Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) has a higher volatility of 25.60% compared to ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) at 17.99%. This indicates that EFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFOR | ON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.60% | 17.99% | +7.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 89.01% | 54.11% | +34.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.62% | 63.32% | +14.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 55.46% | -9.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.42% | 52.10% | -9.68% |
Dividends
EFOR vs. ON - Dividend Comparison
Neither EFOR nor ON has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EFOR vs. ON - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everforth, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFOR vs. ON - Profitability Comparison
EFOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 301.70M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
ON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
EFOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported an operating income of 28.30M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
ON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.
EFOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a net income of 14.20M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
ON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFOR and ON have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFOR has higher volatility (25.60%) compared to ON (17.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFOR dropped -95.98% vs ON's -96.34%.
ON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFOR and ON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer