PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFOR vs. ON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFOR vs. ON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFOR achieves a -62.05% return, which is significantly lower than ON's 66.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EFOR has underperformed ON with an annualized return of -7.04%, while ON has yielded a comparatively higher 25.41% annualized return.


EFOR

1D
4.22%
1M
-13.04%
6M
-64.02%
YTD
-62.05%
1Y
-62.40%
3Y*
-38.60%
5Y*
-28.40%
10Y*
-7.04%

ON

1D
-5.83%
1M
-22.62%
6M
53.82%
YTD
66.89%
1Y
51.30%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
25.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFOR vs. ON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFOR
Everforth, Inc.
-62.05%-42.20%-13.34%18.03%-33.97%47.73%17.70%30.22%-15.20%45.54%
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
66.89%-14.12%-24.52%33.93%-8.17%107.52%34.25%47.67%-21.16%64.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EFOR and ON is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2000

0.32

The correlation between EFOR and ON shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFOR:

$749.48M

ON:

$35.17B

EPS

EFOR:

$2.27

ON:

$1.43

PE Ratio

EFOR:

8.06

ON:

63.24

PS Ratio

EFOR:

0.20

ON:

5.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFOR:

$3.98B

ON:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFOR:

$1.10B

ON:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFOR:

$446.30M

ON:

$1.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFOR vs. ON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFOR
EFOR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ON
ON Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ON Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ON Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ON Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFOR vs. ON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFORONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.20

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

1.52

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.81

3.32

-5.13

EFOR vs. ON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the ON Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFOR and ON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFOR vs. ON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFOR drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ON drawdown of -96.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFOR and ON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFORONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

-96.34%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.34%

-33.87%

-35.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.72%

-70.44%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.00%

-70.44%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.00%

-70.44%

-16.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.07%

-32.52%

-53.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-53.82%

+14.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.45%

15.52%

+18.93%

Volatility

EFOR vs. ON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) is 23.73%, while ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) has a volatility of 36.53%. This indicates that EFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFORONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.73%

36.53%

-12.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

85.46%

53.10%

+32.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.32%

62.59%

+11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.83%

55.27%

-10.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.69%

51.95%

-10.26%

Dividends

EFOR vs. ON - Dividend Comparison

Neither EFOR nor ON has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EFOR vs. ON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everforth, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
968.30M
1.51B
(EFOR) Total Revenue
(ON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFOR vs. ON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everforth, Inc. and ON Semiconductor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
25.8%
38.5%
Portfolio components
EFOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.50M and revenue of 968.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

ON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 583.10M and revenue of 1.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

EFOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -53.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

EFOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a net income of 5.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

ON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ON Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of -33.40M and revenue of 1.51B, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFOR and ON have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ON has higher volatility (36.53%) compared to EFOR (23.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFOR dropped -95.98% vs ON's -96.34%.

ON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFOR and ON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer