PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFOR vs. CHKP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFOR vs. CHKP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFOR achieves a -57.38% return, which is significantly lower than CHKP's -26.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EFOR has underperformed CHKP with an annualized return of -5.84%, while CHKP has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.


EFOR

1D
-8.47%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
-57.38%
6M
-54.81%
1Y
-61.10%
3Y*
-33.32%
5Y*
-27.12%
10Y*
-5.84%

CHKP

1D
-3.13%
1M
16.06%
YTD
-26.88%
6M
-29.00%
1Y
-40.98%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFOR vs. CHKP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFOR
Everforth, Inc.
-57.38%-42.20%-13.34%18.03%-33.97%47.73%17.70%30.22%-15.20%45.54%
CHKP
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
-26.88%-0.61%22.19%21.11%8.24%-12.30%19.78%8.10%-0.94%22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EFOR and CHKP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1996

0.27

The correlation between EFOR and CHKP shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

EFOR:

$2.26

CHKP:

$9.74

PE Ratio

EFOR:

9.10

CHKP:

13.93

PS Ratio

EFOR:

0.22

CHKP:

5.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFOR:

$3.98B

CHKP:

$2.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFOR:

$1.10B

CHKP:

$2.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFOR:

$446.30M

CHKP:

$965.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFOR vs. CHKP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFOR
EFOR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

CHKP
CHKP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CHKP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHKP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHKP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CHKP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHKP Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFOR vs. CHKP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFORCHKPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.79

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.79

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.23

-1.58

-0.66

EFOR vs. CHKP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is comparable to the CHKP Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFOR and CHKP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFORCHKPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

-1.08

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.62

0.09

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.18

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.25

-0.12

Drawdowns

EFOR vs. CHKP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFOR drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than CHKP's maximum drawdown of -89.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFOR and CHKP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFORCHKPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

-89.31%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.82%

-51.83%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.44%

-51.83%

-31.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.78%

-51.83%

-34.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.78%

-51.83%

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.36%

-41.89%

-42.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-41.58%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.35%

25.99%

+1.36%

Volatility

EFOR vs. CHKP - Volatility Comparison

Everforth, Inc. (EFOR) has a higher volatility of 20.29% compared to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) at 9.61%. This indicates that EFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHKP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFORCHKPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.29%

9.61%

+10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.76%

32.43%

+50.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.15%

37.93%

+33.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.75%

27.59%

+16.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.20%

26.04%

+15.16%

Dividends

EFOR vs. CHKP - Dividend Comparison

Neither EFOR nor CHKP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EFOR vs. CHKP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everforth, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B20222023202420252026
968.30M
668.40M
(EFOR) Total Revenue
(CHKP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EFOR vs. CHKP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Everforth, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
25.8%
85.0%
Portfolio components
EFOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 249.50M and revenue of 968.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

CHKP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a gross profit of 568.30M and revenue of 668.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.

EFOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

CHKP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported an operating income of 185.10M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

EFOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everforth, Inc. reported a net income of 5.50M and revenue of 968.30M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

CHKP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. reported a net income of 191.60M and revenue of 668.40M, resulting in a net margin of 28.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFOR and CHKP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFOR has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to CHKP (9.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFOR dropped -95.98% vs CHKP's -89.31%.

EFOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFOR and CHKP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer