EFO vs. XDQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ).
EFO and XDQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. XDQQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
EFO vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EFO vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 2.62% | 58.51% | -2.15% | 25.77% | -33.62% | 8.71% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | -5.48% | 13.75% | 31.47% | 30.15% | -33.74% | 18.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than XDQQ's -5.48% return.
EFO
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -10.01%
- YTD
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 40.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
XDQQ
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFO vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDQQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
XDQQ
EFO vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFO | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.78 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.27 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.38 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 6.03 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFO | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.78 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and XDQQ is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EFO vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XDQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.69% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EFO vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than XDQQ's maximum drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and XDQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -35.63% | -27.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -12.64% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.12% | -7.84% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -11.14% | -7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 2.88% | +3.18% |
Volatility
EFO vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) at 7.13%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.52% | 7.13% | +7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | 12.80% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.16% | 21.42% | +13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 19.95% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 19.95% | +13.93% |