EFO vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFO is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, EFO returned 34.57% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.

Performance

EFO vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.

EFO

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 23.50%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

MUU

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 218.90%
• YTD: 961.23%
• 6M: 1,422.01%
• 1Y: 6,522.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	12.87%	58.51%	-14.23%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	961.23%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and MUU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.42

Return for Risk

EFO vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO

EFO Risk / Return Rank: 32
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EFO	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	50.40	-49.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	7.17	-5.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.91	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	125.85	-124.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	426.84	-421.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EFO vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EFO	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	50.40	-49.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	6.68	-6.45

Drawdowns

EFO vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFO	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.52%	-75.07%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.18%	-52.72%	+30.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.54%	0.00%	-5.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.67%	-23.44%	+4.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.39%	15.51%	-9.12%

Volatility

EFO vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) is 10.08%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that EFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFO	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	54.78%	-44.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.18%	105.07%	-79.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.54%	131.77%	-101.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.98%	133.67%	-100.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.09%	133.67%	-99.58%

EFO vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFO vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	1.54%	1.65%	2.24%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	0.11%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.46%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFO and MUU in my portfolio?

EFO and MUU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFO or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to EFO (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, EFO or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 34.57% for EFO. On fees, EFO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EFO has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFO or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 34.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFO or MUU?

EFO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFO or MUU?

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.

What is the main difference between EFO and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 1.06% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.