PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFO vs. FEUZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFO vs. FEUZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFO achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than FEUZ's 11.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFO having a 10.16% annualized return and FEUZ not far ahead at 10.35%.


EFO

1D
-1.58%
1M
6.17%
YTD
12.87%
6M
17.60%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.16%

FEUZ

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.37%
YTD
11.32%
6M
15.72%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFO vs. FEUZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
12.87%58.51%-2.15%25.77%-33.62%19.38%2.29%40.93%-30.91%51.78%
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
11.32%56.34%1.64%17.24%-19.83%11.93%5.04%22.06%-20.61%36.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EFO and FEUZ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2014

0.72

The correlation between EFO and FEUZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFO vs. FEUZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFO
FEUZ

Financial Services

40.7%
10.6%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Energy

-

10.8%

Healthcare

-

5.2%

Industrials

-

27.4%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

-

6.1%

Utilities

-

8.3%

Financial Services

EFO
40.7%
FEUZ
10.6%

Basic Materials

EFO

-

FEUZ
7.5%

Communication Services

EFO

-

FEUZ
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EFO

-

FEUZ
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

EFO

-

FEUZ
5.3%

Energy

EFO

-

FEUZ
10.8%

Healthcare

EFO

-

FEUZ
5.2%

Industrials

EFO

-

FEUZ
27.4%

Real Estate

EFO

-

FEUZ
6.0%

Technology

EFO

-

FEUZ
6.1%

Utilities

EFO

-

FEUZ
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFO vs. FEUZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO
EFO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FEUZ
FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFO vs. FEUZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFOFEUZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.49

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

9.42

-4.00

EFO vs. FEUZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FEUZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFO and FEUZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFOFEUZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

1.80

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.46

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.48

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.44

-0.20

Drawdowns

EFO vs. FEUZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than FEUZ's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and FEUZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFOFEUZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-48.08%

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-12.49%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-18.02%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.95%

-38.64%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.52%

-48.08%

-15.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-1.24%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-10.49%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

3.29%

+3.10%

Volatility

EFO vs. FEUZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) at 6.59%. This indicates that EFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEUZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFOFEUZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

6.59%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

14.34%

+10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.54%

17.31%

+13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.98%

21.96%

+11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

21.78%

+12.31%

EFO vs. FEUZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEUZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFO vs. FEUZ - Dividend Comparison

EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than FEUZ's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
1.54%1.65%2.24%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.37%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
2.37%2.81%2.01%2.95%3.14%2.52%1.46%1.93%2.46%1.29%2.12%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFO and FEUZ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFO has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to FEUZ (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFO dropped -63.52% vs FEUZ's -48.08%.

On 10-year performance, FEUZ leads with 10.35% vs 10.16% for EFO. On fees, FEUZ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FEUZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEUZ has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 10.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEUZ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

FEUZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.54% for EFO.

EFO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FEUZ is Europe Equities. EFO tracks MSCI EAFE Index (200%), while FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.80% for FEUZ.

FEUZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFO and FEUZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer