EFO vs. BRKL
EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EFO is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EFO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
EFO vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EFO
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 44.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.79%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $261.38K | $262.27K | $430.81K |
EFO vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | -0.28% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFO and BRKL is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFO vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
EFO
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFO vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFO vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFO drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFO and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.52% | -7.03% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.13% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -4.14% | -14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | — | — |
Volatility
EFO vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFO | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.88% | 30.99% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.25% | 30.99% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.58% | 30.99% | +2.59% |
EFO vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFO vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE | 1.57% | 1.65% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFO and BRKL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.
EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EFO and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for EFO and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer