PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFIV vs. SUSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFIV vs. SUSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFIV vs. SUSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
-4.39%18.47%23.80%27.92%-17.76%31.70%16.69%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
-6.08%18.97%23.51%29.08%-20.22%31.53%16.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a -4.39% return, which is significantly higher than SUSL's -6.08% return.


EFIV

1D
2.85%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-4.39%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*

SUSL

1D
3.05%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-2.41%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFIV vs. SUSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFIV and SUSL have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EFIV vs. SUSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSL
SUSL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. SUSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFIVSUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.09

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.65

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.77

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

7.04

+0.53

EFIV vs. SUSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the SUSL Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and SUSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFIVSUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.09

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.74

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and SUSL is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EFIV vs. SUSL - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches SUSL's 1.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
1.08%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%0.00%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
1.08%0.99%1.10%1.27%1.57%1.12%1.38%1.12%

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. SUSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum SUSL drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and SUSL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFIVSUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-34.26%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-11.37%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-26.98%

+2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-8.67%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.81%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.86%

-0.21%

Volatility

EFIV vs. SUSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 5.18%, while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFIVSUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.60%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

10.19%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

18.33%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.44%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

19.93%

-2.97%