EFIV vs. SUSL
EFIV (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF) and SUSL (iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFIV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index, while SUSL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFIV returned 14.48%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for SUSL. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
EFIV vs. SUSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than SUSL's 9.27% return.
EFIV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSL
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- —
EFIV vs. SUSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 9.91% | 18.47% | 23.80% | 27.92% | -17.76% | 31.70% | 16.69% |
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | 9.27% | 18.97% | 23.51% | 29.08% | -20.22% | 31.53% | 16.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFIV and SUSL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between EFIV and SUSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFIV vs. SUSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFIV
SUSL
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
EFIV
SUSL
Communication Services
EFIV
SUSL
Financial Services
EFIV
SUSL
Healthcare
EFIV
SUSL
Industrials
EFIV
SUSL
Consumer Defensive
EFIV
SUSL
Consumer Cyclical
EFIV
SUSL
Energy
EFIV
SUSL
Real Estate
EFIV
SUSL
Utilities
EFIV
SUSL
Basic Materials
EFIV
SUSL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFIV vs. SUSL — Risk / Return Rank
EFIV
SUSL
EFIV vs. SUSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFIV | SUSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.38 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.44 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 10.49 | +4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFIV | SUSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.14 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.85 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
EFIV vs. SUSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum SUSL drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and SUSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFIV | SUSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.52% | -34.26% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -11.37% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -19.91% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -26.98% | +2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -1.38% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -5.70% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.64% | -0.60% |
Volatility
EFIV vs. SUSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is 3.14%, while iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that EFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFIV | SUSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.68% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 9.98% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 12.98% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.48% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 19.80% | -2.97% |
EFIV vs. SUSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EFIV and SUSL have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EFIV vs. SUSL - Dividend Comparison
EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than SUSL's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFIV State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.64% | 1.19% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | 0.93% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.27% | 1.57% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EFIV and SUSL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SUSL has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to EFIV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs SUSL's -34.26%.
On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.48% vs 13.77% for SUSL. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, EFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFIV and SUSL have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
EFIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.93% for SUSL.
EFIV is categorized as S&P 500, while SUSL is Large Cap Growth Equities. EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFIV and SUSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer