PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFIV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFIV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFIV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return.


EFIV

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.63%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.51%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFIV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
9.91%18.47%23.80%27.92%-17.76%31.70%16.69%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%17.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EFIV and SPYM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.99

The correlation between EFIV and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFIV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFIV
SPYM

Technology

36.9%
38.5%

Communication Services

12.8%
10.6%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.1%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.4%

Industrials

7.5%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
9.9%

Energy

2.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.7%

Technology

EFIV
36.9%
SPYM
38.5%

Communication Services

EFIV
12.8%
SPYM
10.6%

Financial Services

EFIV
12.5%
SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

EFIV
10.7%
SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

EFIV
7.5%
SPYM
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFIV
5.3%
SPYM
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EFIV
5.0%
SPYM
9.9%

Energy

EFIV
2.9%
SPYM
3.2%

Real Estate

EFIV
2.2%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

EFIV
2.1%
SPYM
2.5%

Basic Materials

EFIV
2.0%
SPYM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFIV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFIV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFIVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.17

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

14.76

+0.26

EFIV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFIV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFIVSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.39

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.62

+0.44

Drawdowns

EFIV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFIV drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFIV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFIVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-54.46%

+29.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-8.90%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-18.72%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-24.48%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.66%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-7.15%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.91%

+0.13%

Volatility

EFIV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that EFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFIVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.83%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

8.90%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

11.80%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.80%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

18.00%

-1.17%

EFIV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFIV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFIV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

EFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
0.94%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EFIV and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFIV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFIV dropped -24.52% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 5-year performance, EFIV leads with 14.48% vs 13.91% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFIV has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EFIV.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.94% for EFIV.

EFIV tracks S&P 500 ESG Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EFIV and 0.02% for SPYM.

EFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFIV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer