PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFG vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFG vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 8.02%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.


EFG

1D
0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
8.93%
6M
9.83%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
8.02%

VXUS

1D
0.17%
1M
3.40%
YTD
14.45%
6M
16.87%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
8.93%20.70%1.53%17.55%-23.12%11.01%17.85%27.47%-12.93%28.86%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.45%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and VXUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2011

0.94

The correlation between EFG and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFG
VXUS

Industrials

29.6%
16.1%

Technology

18.1%
18.1%

Healthcare

14.2%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

10.6%
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.8%
4.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
7.6%

Utilities

1.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.6%

Energy

0.2%
5.2%

Industrials

EFG
29.6%
VXUS
16.1%

Technology

EFG
18.1%
VXUS
18.1%

Healthcare

EFG
14.2%
VXUS
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EFG
10.7%
VXUS
8.4%

Financial Services

EFG
10.6%
VXUS
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

EFG
5.1%
VXUS
5.0%

Communication Services

EFG
4.8%
VXUS
4.4%

Basic Materials

EFG
4.6%
VXUS
7.6%

Utilities

EFG
1.1%
VXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

EFG
1.0%
VXUS
2.6%

Energy

EFG
0.2%
VXUS
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFG vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG
EFG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFGVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.80

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

10.92

-6.66

EFG vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFGVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.08

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.53

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.57

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.39

-0.09

Drawdowns

EFG vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFGVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-35.97%

-22.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.78%

-11.27%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-13.58%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-29.44%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-35.97%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.82%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-8.22%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.88%

+0.58%

Volatility

EFG vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFGVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

5.46%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

13.00%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

15.20%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

16.04%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.15%

+0.54%

EFG vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFG vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than VXUS's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.32%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.65%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, EFG and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFG has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to VXUS (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.69% vs 8.02% for EFG. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EFG.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 2.32% for EFG.

EFG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFG and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer