PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFG vs. IHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFG vs. IHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFG achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly higher than IHDG's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EFG has underperformed IHDG with an annualized return of 8.09%, while IHDG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


EFG

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.52%
1Y
11.82%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
8.09%

IHDG

1D
0.41%
1M
1.23%
YTD
4.98%
6M
6.90%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
10.60%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFG vs. IHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
6.44%20.70%1.53%17.55%-23.12%11.01%17.85%27.47%-12.93%28.86%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
4.98%14.17%5.97%20.00%-11.53%19.75%10.51%33.42%-12.03%21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EFG and IHDG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2014

0.86

The correlation between EFG and IHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFG vs. IHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFG
IHDG

Industrials

29.6%
19.7%

Technology

18.1%
7.8%

Healthcare

14.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
19.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

4.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.4%

Utilities

1.1%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.3%

Energy

0.2%
3.7%

Industrials

EFG
29.6%
IHDG
19.7%

Technology

EFG
18.1%
IHDG
7.8%

Healthcare

EFG
14.2%
IHDG
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EFG
10.7%
IHDG
19.3%

Financial Services

EFG
10.6%
IHDG
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

EFG
5.1%
IHDG
4.3%

Communication Services

EFG
4.8%
IHDG
4.5%

Basic Materials

EFG
4.6%
IHDG
5.4%

Utilities

EFG
1.1%
IHDG
0.8%

Real Estate

EFG
1.0%
IHDG
0.3%

Energy

EFG
0.2%
IHDG
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFG vs. IHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFG
EFG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IHDG
IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFG vs. IHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFGIHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.34

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

4.95

-1.54

EFG vs. IHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFG Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the IHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFG and IHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFGIHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.03

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.51

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.65

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Drawdowns

EFG vs. IHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFG drawdown since its inception was -58.40%, which is greater than IHDG's maximum drawdown of -29.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFG and IHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFGIHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-29.24%

-29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.78%

-10.49%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-18.88%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.78%

-19.52%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.78%

-29.24%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-1.69%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-4.04%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.84%

+0.63%

Volatility

EFG vs. IHDG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) at 3.83%. This indicates that EFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFGIHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.83%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

11.35%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

13.71%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

14.85%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

15.78%

+1.95%

EFG vs. IHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IHDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFG vs. IHDG - Dividend Comparison

EFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than IHDG's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.37%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
1.83%1.84%2.42%1.70%13.79%2.77%1.94%1.99%0.22%1.28%1.91%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFG and IHDG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to IHDG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFG dropped -58.40% vs IHDG's -29.24%.

On 10-year performance, IHDG leads with 10.27% vs 8.09% for EFG. On fees, EFG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IHDG has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IHDG.

EFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.83% for IHDG.

EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index, while IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EFG and 0.58% for IHDG.

IHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFG and IHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer