PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFEIX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFEIX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than COBYX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EFEIX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 7.16%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.


EFEIX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.46%
YTD
2.96%
6M
6.03%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
7.16%

COBYX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.74%
6M
13.67%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
2.96%20.69%24.12%10.60%-15.91%24.18%-4.12%14.07%-18.04%19.28%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
10.74%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EFEIX and COBYX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.36

The correlation between EFEIX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFEIX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFEIX
EFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
EFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFEIXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.62

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

5.15

-0.83

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFEIX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFEIXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.23

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.59

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.35

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.39

+0.02

Drawdowns

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFEIX drawdown since its inception was -40.50%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFEIX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFEIXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.50%

-34.18%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-8.95%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-16.29%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

-17.10%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.50%

-34.18%

-6.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-1.12%

-3.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-6.80%

-5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

2.99%

+0.88%

Volatility

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) is 3.11%, while The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that EFEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFEIXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.75%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

9.46%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

11.78%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.97%

13.99%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.04%

13.64%

-2.60%

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFEIX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFEIX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

EFEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than COBYX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.06%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
11.06%11.69%2.15%2.26%0.17%1.61%0.96%1.63%1.44%0.88%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFEIX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COBYX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to EFEIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFEIX dropped -40.50% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

EFEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFEIX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer