EFEIX vs. MADCX
EFEIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund) and MADCX (BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, EFEIX returned 7.18%/yr vs 11.57%/yr for MADCX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFEIX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for MADCX.
Performance
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFEIX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than MADCX's 35.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EFEIX has underperformed MADCX with an annualized return of 7.18%, while MADCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
EFEIX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
MADCX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 35.77%
- 6M
- 37.64%
- 1Y
- 64.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund | 4.99% | 20.69% | 24.12% | 10.60% | -15.91% | 24.18% | -4.12% | 14.07% | -18.04% | 19.28% |
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 35.77% | 30.47% | -1.09% | 10.77% | -24.12% | -1.14% | 24.53% | 26.47% | -10.73% | 42.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFEIX and MADCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EFEIX and MADCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFEIX vs. MADCX — Risk / Return Rank
EFEIX
MADCX
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) and BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EFEIX | MADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.51 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 4.12 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 15.96 | -10.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFEIX drawdown since its inception was -40.50%, smaller than the maximum MADCX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFEIX and MADCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFEIX | MADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.50% | -66.58% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -15.57% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -20.25% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.83% | -40.70% | +19.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.50% | -43.82% | +3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | 0.00% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.25% | -18.35% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 4.01% | +0.01% |
Volatility
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) is 3.93%, while BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that EFEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MADCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFEIX | MADCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 11.91% | -7.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 21.05% | -10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 23.28% | -11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.07% | 18.77% | -8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 18.85% | -7.78% |
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFEIX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MADCX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFEIX vs. MADCX - Dividend Comparison
EFEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than MADCX's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund | 10.45% | 11.69% | 2.15% | 2.26% | 0.17% | 1.61% | 0.96% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 0.88% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 3.14% | 4.26% | 1.90% | 1.67% | 2.22% | 5.72% | 0.97% | 1.53% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 1.82% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFEIX and MADCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MADCX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to EFEIX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFEIX dropped -40.50% vs MADCX's -66.58%.
MADCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFEIX and MADCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer