PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFEIX vs. MADCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) and BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFEIX achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than MADCX's 35.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EFEIX has underperformed MADCX with an annualized return of 7.18%, while MADCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.


EFEIX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.08%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.69%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
7.18%

MADCX

1D
3.68%
1M
7.04%
YTD
35.77%
6M
37.64%
1Y
64.24%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
11.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
4.99%20.69%24.12%10.60%-15.91%24.18%-4.12%14.07%-18.04%19.28%
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
35.77%30.47%-1.09%10.77%-24.12%-1.14%24.53%26.47%-10.73%42.09%

Correlation

The correlation between EFEIX and MADCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2013

0.54

The correlation between EFEIX and MADCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFEIX vs. MADCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFEIX
EFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MADCX
MADCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MADCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MADCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) and BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFEIXMADCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.51

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.12

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.04

15.96

-10.92

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the MADCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFEIX and MADCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFEIX drawdown since its inception was -40.50%, smaller than the maximum MADCX drawdown of -66.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFEIX and MADCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFEIXMADCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.50%

-66.58%

+26.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-15.57%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-20.25%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

-40.70%

+19.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.50%

-43.82%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

0.00%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-18.35%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

4.01%

+0.01%

Volatility

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) is 3.93%, while BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a volatility of 11.91%. This indicates that EFEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MADCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFEIXMADCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

11.91%

-7.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

21.05%

-10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

23.28%

-11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.07%

18.77%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

18.85%

-7.78%

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFEIX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MADCX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFEIX vs. MADCX - Dividend Comparison

EFEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than MADCX's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
10.45%11.69%2.15%2.26%0.17%1.61%0.96%1.63%1.44%0.88%0.38%0.00%
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
3.14%4.26%1.90%1.67%2.22%5.72%0.97%1.53%0.98%0.48%1.82%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFEIX and MADCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADCX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to EFEIX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFEIX dropped -40.50% vs MADCX's -66.58%.

MADCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFEIX and MADCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer