PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFC vs. TRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFC vs. TRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFC achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than TRTX's 7.90% return.


EFC

1D
0.15%
1M
0.52%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.14%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
9.12%

TRTX

1D
5.92%
1M
8.73%
YTD
7.90%
6M
4.17%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFC vs. TRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
4.12%26.13%8.68%18.16%-18.32%26.33%-10.16%32.43%17.29%-4.91%
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
7.90%13.50%46.93%9.71%-38.40%25.11%-31.46%20.90%4.67%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EFC and TRTX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2017

0.60

The correlation between EFC and TRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFC:

$1.64B

TRTX:

$679.95M

EPS

EFC:

$1.95

TRTX:

$0.78

PE Ratio

EFC:

6.91

TRTX:

11.08

PS Ratio

EFC:

3.37

TRTX:

2.57

PB Ratio

EFC:

0.96

TRTX:

0.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFC:

$417.93M

TRTX:

$264.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFC:

$347.01M

TRTX:

$207.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFC:

$270.77M

TRTX:

$195.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFC vs. TRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFC
EFC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TRTX
TRTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFC vs. TRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFCTRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.75

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

4.11

-0.74

EFC vs. TRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the TRTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFC and TRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFC vs. TRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFC drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, smaller than the maximum TRTX drawdown of -86.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFC and TRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFCTRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.08%

-86.18%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.71%

-15.90%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.86%

-30.01%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.19%

-54.39%

+20.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.21%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-20.93%

+11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

6.75%

-1.32%

Volatility

EFC vs. TRTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) is 4.43%, while TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. (TRTX) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that EFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFCTRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

7.56%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

15.71%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

21.30%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.95%

34.99%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.26%

57.72%

-15.46%

Dividends

EFC vs. TRTX - Dividend Comparison

EFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, less than TRTX's 15.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.61%11.49%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%
TRTX
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
15.70%11.15%11.29%14.77%14.14%7.71%15.44%8.49%9.35%3.73%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EFC vs. TRTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Financial Inc. and TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
61.25M
11.59M
(EFC) Total Revenue
(TRTX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EFC and TRTX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRTX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to EFC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFC dropped -79.08% vs TRTX's -86.18%.

TRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFC and TRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer