EFC vs. SEVN

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

EFC (Ellington Financial Inc.) and SEVN (Seven Hills Realty Trust) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, EFC returned 5.86%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for SEVN. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EFC vs. SEVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFC achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than SEVN's -1.70% return.

EFC

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 18.27%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 5.86%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

SEVN

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -3.65%
• 1Y: -21.57%
• 3Y*: 6.09%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFC vs. SEVN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EFC Ellington Financial Inc.	4.12%	26.13%	8.68%	18.16%	-18.32%	26.33%	26.98%
SEVN Seven Hills Realty Trust	-1.70%	-24.34%	12.15%	61.84%	-3.75%	2.18%	-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EFC and SEVN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020	0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap EFC : $1.64B SEVN : $183.66M
EPS EFC : $1.95 SEVN : $0.91
PE Ratio EFC : 6.91 SEVN : 9.02
PS Ratio EFC : 3.37 SEVN : 3.15
PB Ratio EFC : 0.96 SEVN : 0.56
Total Revenue (TTM) EFC : $417.93M SEVN : $43.74M
Gross Profit (TTM) EFC : $347.01M SEVN : $29.11M
EBITDA (TTM) EFC : $270.77M SEVN : $23.30M

Return for Risk

EFC vs. SEVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFC

EFC Risk / Return Rank: 68
EFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EFC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EFC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SEVN

SEVN Risk / Return Rank: 14
SEVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
SEVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SEVN Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SEVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SEVN Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFC vs. SEVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) and Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFC	SEVN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	-0.86	+1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	-1.07	+2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.86	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	-0.69	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.37	-0.92	+4.29

EFC vs. SEVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the SEVN Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFC and SEVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFC vs. SEVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFC drawdown since its inception was -79.08%, which is greater than SEVN's maximum drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFC and SEVN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFC	SEVN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.08%	-40.70%	-38.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-31.48%	+13.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-33.87%	+15.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.19%	-33.87%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-30.85%	+29.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	-11.94%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	23.47%	-18.04%

Volatility

EFC vs. SEVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) is 4.43%, while Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that EFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFC	SEVN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	5.54%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.27%	14.02%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.64%	25.04%	-7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.95%	25.86%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.26%	25.92%	+16.34%

Dividends

EFC vs. SEVN - Dividend Comparison

EFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, less than SEVN's 13.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFC Ellington Financial Inc.	11.61%	11.49%	13.20%	14.16%	14.55%	9.60%	8.49%	9.87%	10.70%	12.13%	12.56%	14.60%
SEVN Seven Hills Realty Trust	13.66%	14.16%	10.70%	10.82%	11.00%	4.34%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFC and SEVN in my portfolio?

EFC and SEVN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFC or SEVN?

SEVN has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to EFC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFC dropped -79.08% vs SEVN's -40.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.