PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.


EFAX

1D
-1.25%
1M
-0.20%
6M
4.18%
YTD
7.84%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
7.84%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and UUP is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

-0.44

The correlation between EFAX and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.58 (1 year) to -0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFAXUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.28

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

6.26

-0.86

EFAX vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-22.19%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-3.65%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-10.05%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-10.37%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.26%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-8.88%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.33%

+2.03%

Volatility

EFAX vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

1.45%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

4.34%

+9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

6.03%

+10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

7.22%

+9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

6.90%

+10.22%

EFAX vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAX vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.18%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and UUP have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 5-year performance, EFAX leads with 7.92% vs 5.89% for UUP. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 7.92% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 3.18% for EFAX.

EFAX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while UUP is Currency. EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.75% for UUP.

UUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer