PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-13.81%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and FID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.77

The correlation between EFAX and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
FID

Financial Services

18.6%
20.8%

Technology

11.6%
4.1%

Industrials

9.5%
13.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
11.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
9.4%

Energy

1.5%
8.0%

Utilities

1.2%
17.4%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
FID
20.8%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
FID
4.1%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
FID
13.5%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
FID
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
FID
4.0%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
FID
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
FID
3.7%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
FID
11.5%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
FID
9.4%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
FID
8.0%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
FID
17.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXFIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.41

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.62

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

9.14

-3.54

EFAX vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.30

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.46

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.39

+0.14

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-39.79%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-8.93%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-10.97%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-29.13%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.11%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-8.47%

+1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.55%

+0.79%

Volatility

EFAX vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

3.00%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

8.12%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

10.16%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

17.04%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

18.96%

-1.86%

EFAX vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFAX vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFAX and FID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.22% for EFAX.

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.60% for FID.

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer