EFAX vs. FID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAX tracks the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAX returned 7.77%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for FID. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.

Performance

EFAX vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 5.57% return.

EFAX

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 6M: 6.79%
• 1Y: 19.90%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: —

FID

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 5.57%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: 18.04%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 7.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF	7.16%	31.30%	4.78%	18.02%	-16.72%	10.50%	9.57%	23.52%	-13.32%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	5.57%	32.07%	5.42%	9.92%	-9.69%	12.90%	-7.56%	20.82%	-7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and FID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.77

The correlation between EFAX and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAX	FID
Financial Services	18.6%	20.4%
Technology	13.0%	6.3%
Industrials	9.2%	13.6%
Healthcare	8.6%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	3.8%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	3.7%
Communication Services	3.3%	11.3%
Energy	1.5%	7.9%
Real Estate	1.5%	9.1%
Utilities	1.1%	16.3%

Return for Risk

EFAX vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX

EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FID

FID Risk / Return Rank: 50
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAX	FID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.76	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.48	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.31	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	2.03	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	6.97	-1.03

EFAX vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FID Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and FID.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAX	FID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	-39.79%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-8.93%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.52%	-10.97%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.67%	-29.13%	-2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	-3.84%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.93%	-8.43%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	2.59%	+0.76%

Volatility

EFAX vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.41%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAX	FID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	3.41%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	8.58%	+5.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.28%	10.33%	+5.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	17.05%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	18.92%	-1.79%

EFAX vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAX vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than FID's 4.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF	3.20%	3.31%	2.74%	2.71%	2.81%	2.58%	1.69%	2.71%	3.05%	2.89%	0.26%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.14%	4.30%	4.31%	4.19%	4.22%	3.76%	3.91%	3.70%	1.74%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAX and FID in my portfolio?

EFAX and FID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAX or FID?

EFAX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to FID (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs FID's -39.79%.

Which ETF is better, EFAX or FID?

On 5-year performance, EFAX leads with 7.77% vs 7.59% for FID. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAX or FID?

Over the 5-year period, EFAX has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAX or FID?

EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAX or FID?

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 3.20% for EFAX.

What is the main difference between EFAX and FID?

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.60% for FID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.