EFAX vs. FID
EFAX (SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EFAX tracks the MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAX returned 7.48%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EFAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
EFAX vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 8.56% return.
EFAX
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
EFAX vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 6.64% | 31.30% | 4.78% | 18.02% | -16.72% | 10.50% | 9.57% | 23.52% | -13.81% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFAX and FID is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between EFAX and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EFAX vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EFAX
FID
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
EFAX
FID
Technology
EFAX
FID
Industrials
EFAX
FID
Healthcare
EFAX
FID
Consumer Cyclical
EFAX
FID
Basic Materials
EFAX
FID
Consumer Defensive
EFAX
FID
Communication Services
EFAX
FID
Real Estate
EFAX
FID
Energy
EFAX
FID
Utilities
EFAX
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFAX vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
EFAX
FID
EFAX vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFAX | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.62 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 9.14 | -3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFAX | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.30 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
EFAX vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFAX | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -39.79% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -8.93% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.52% | -10.97% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.67% | -29.13% | -2.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.11% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -8.47% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.55% | +0.79% |
Volatility
EFAX vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFAX | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 3.00% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.11% | 8.12% | +4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 10.16% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 17.04% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 18.96% | -1.86% |
EFAX vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFAX vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAX SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF | 3.22% | 3.31% | 2.74% | 2.71% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.69% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.89% | 0.26% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EFAX and FID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, FID leads with 7.74% vs 7.48% for EFAX. On fees, EFAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FID has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.22% for EFAX.
EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EFAX and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFAX and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer