PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAX vs. ESGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFAX vs. ESGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAX achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than ESGD's 8.31% return.


EFAX

1D
-0.83%
1M
3.93%
YTD
6.64%
6M
9.20%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*

ESGD

1D
-0.81%
1M
3.52%
YTD
8.31%
6M
10.53%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFAX vs. ESGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
6.64%31.30%4.78%18.02%-16.72%10.50%9.57%23.52%-14.78%23.93%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
8.31%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%8.20%23.12%-13.33%25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAX and ESGD is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2016

0.93

The correlation between EFAX and ESGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAX vs. ESGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFAX
ESGD

Financial Services

18.6%
26.4%

Technology

11.6%
11.7%

Industrials

9.5%
19.2%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
7.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
6.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.0%

Energy

1.5%
3.9%

Utilities

1.2%
3.9%

Financial Services

EFAX
18.6%
ESGD
26.4%

Technology

EFAX
11.6%
ESGD
11.7%

Industrials

EFAX
9.5%
ESGD
19.2%

Healthcare

EFAX
9.0%
ESGD
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EFAX
6.1%
ESGD
7.6%

Basic Materials

EFAX
3.9%
ESGD
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

EFAX
3.8%
ESGD
6.4%

Communication Services

EFAX
3.2%
ESGD
4.0%

Real Estate

EFAX
1.6%
ESGD
2.0%

Energy

EFAX
1.5%
ESGD
3.9%

Utilities

EFAX
1.2%
ESGD
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFAX vs. ESGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAX
EFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAX vs. ESGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAXESGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.74

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.61

6.53

-0.92

EFAX vs. ESGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the ESGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAX and ESGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAXESGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Drawdowns

EFAX vs. ESGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ESGD drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAX and ESGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAXESGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-33.70%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-11.68%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.52%

-13.86%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.67%

-30.03%

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-1.36%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-6.19%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.11%

+0.23%

Volatility

EFAX vs. ESGD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF (EFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) at 4.88%. This indicates that EFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAXESGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.88%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

12.59%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

15.22%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.61%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

16.97%

+0.13%

EFAX vs. ESGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EFAX and ESGD have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EFAX vs. ESGD - Dividend Comparison

EFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than ESGD's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAX
SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Free ETF
3.22%3.31%2.74%2.71%2.81%2.58%1.69%2.71%3.05%2.89%0.26%
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.33%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, EFAX and ESGD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFAX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ESGD (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAX dropped -32.53% vs ESGD's -33.70%.

On 5-year performance, ESGD leads with 7.90% vs 7.48% for EFAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGD has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAX and ESGD have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ESGD has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.22% for EFAX.

EFAX tracks MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index, while ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

ESGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFAX and ESGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer