EFA vs. FIGFX
EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) and FIGFX (Fidelity International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EFA returned 9.11%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for FIGFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FIGFX.
Performance
EFA vs. FIGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than FIGFX's 7.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EFA having a 9.11% annualized return and FIGFX not far ahead at 9.27%.
EFA
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
FIGFX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
EFA vs. FIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 8.42% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund | 7.22% | 17.91% | 4.90% | 20.89% | -23.19% | 15.42% | 16.95% | 33.97% | -11.52% | 28.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFA and FIGFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between EFA and FIGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFA vs. FIGFX — Risk / Return Rank
EFA
FIGFX
EFA vs. FIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFA | FIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.03 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 3.80 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFA | FIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.79 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.32 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.52 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
EFA vs. FIGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than FIGFX's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and FIGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFA | FIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.04% | -55.97% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -13.95% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -16.51% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.53% | -34.91% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.19% | -34.91% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -2.17% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -10.40% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.77% | -0.73% |
Volatility
EFA vs. FIGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) is 4.98%, while Fidelity International Growth Fund (FIGFX) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that EFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFA | FIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 7.29% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 15.88% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 18.27% | -3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 18.08% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.83% | -0.57% |
EFA vs. FIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
EFA vs. FIGFX - Dividend Comparison
EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than FIGFX's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.12% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
FIGFX Fidelity International Growth Fund | 3.21% | 3.44% | 0.78% | 0.48% | 1.66% | 1.93% | 0.11% | 0.97% | 0.88% | 0.12% | 1.24% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EFA and FIGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIGFX has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to EFA (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFA dropped -61.04% vs FIGFX's -55.97%.
EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EFA and FIGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer