PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFA vs. EGPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFA vs. EGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EFA

1D
0.56%
1M
2.86%
YTD
9.36%
6M
12.50%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.21%

EGPT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFA vs. EGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
9.36%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%
EGPT
VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF
0.00%0.00%-11.22%27.27%-24.66%11.31%-11.53%6.80%-13.88%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EFA and EGPT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2010

0.29

The correlation between EFA and EGPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EFA vs. EGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EFA
EGPT

Financial Services

24.6%
10.5%

Industrials

19.9%
6.9%

Healthcare

10.6%
2.0%

Technology

10.4%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
10.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%
23.4%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.2%

Energy

4.0%
1.1%

Utilities

4.0%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
30.5%

Financial Services

EFA
24.6%
EGPT
10.5%

Industrials

EFA
19.9%
EGPT
6.9%

Healthcare

EFA
10.6%
EGPT
2.0%

Technology

EFA
10.4%
EGPT
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EFA
7.6%
EGPT
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EFA
6.7%
EGPT
10.0%

Basic Materials

EFA
5.9%
EGPT
23.4%

Communication Services

EFA
4.5%
EGPT
4.2%

Energy

EFA
4.0%
EGPT
1.1%

Utilities

EFA
4.0%
EGPT

-

Real Estate

EFA
1.9%
EGPT
30.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFA vs. EGPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

EGPT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFA vs. EGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFAEGPTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.39

EFA vs. EGPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFAEGPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

Drawdowns

EFA vs. EGPT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFAEGPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

Volatility

EFA vs. EGPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFAEGPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

EFA vs. EGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EGPT's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFA vs. EGPT - Dividend Comparison

EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.09%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
EGPT
VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.15%6.02%1.32%2.45%2.50%2.09%1.72%0.77%1.60%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


EFA and EGPT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.

EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.

EFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EGPT is Emerging Markets Equities. EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net), while EGPT tracks MVIS Egypt Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EFA and 0.98% for EGPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFA and EGPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer