PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFA vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EFA vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFA achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 6.77% return.


EFA

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.16%
6M
6.46%
YTD
11.69%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
9.47%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

BUFI

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.60%
6M
4.45%
YTD
6.77%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$181.70K$602.68K$512.75K
$1.24B$1.12B$1.39B

EFA vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
11.69%31.55%-4.24%
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
6.77%16.50%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EFA and BUFI is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.97

The correlation between EFA and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFA vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFA vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EFABUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.61

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

10.48

-2.25

EFA vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFA and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EFA vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFA drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFA and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFABUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-7.43%

-53.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-5.69%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.60%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-0.84%

-11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.41%

+1.61%

Volatility

EFA vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 3.43%. This indicates that EFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFABUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

3.43%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

7.96%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

9.04%

+6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

9.28%

+7.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

9.28%

+7.72%

EFA vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EFA vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

EFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.19%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EFA and BUFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EFA has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to BUFI (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFA dropped -61.04% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, EFA leads with 25.09% vs 14.79% for BUFI. On fees, EFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EFA has performed better with a 25.09% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

EFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EFA and 0.69% for BUFI.

BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFA and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer