PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EEWD.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - EEWD.L tracks the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWD.L returned 10.51%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for ISAC.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEWD.L achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.65% return.

EEWD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.89%
YTD
9.19%
6M
10.66%
1Y
24.82%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
—

ISAC.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.39%
YTD
11.65%
6M
13.33%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EEWD.L
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc		9.19%19.23%18.35%23.17%-20.23%22.70%17.66%15.77%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		11.65%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EEWD.L and ISAC.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.98

The correlation between EEWD.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EEWD.L
ISAC.L

Technology

29.1%
33.9%

Financial Services

16.4%
17.3%

Industrials

10.4%
9.0%

Healthcare

9.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

9.2%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.4%

Energy

4.2%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.9%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.2%

Technology

EEWD.L
29.1%
ISAC.L
33.9%

Financial Services

EEWD.L
16.4%
ISAC.L
17.3%

Industrials

EEWD.L
10.4%
ISAC.L
9.0%

Healthcare

EEWD.L
9.3%
ISAC.L
7.8%

Communication Services

EEWD.L
9.2%
ISAC.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EEWD.L
9.0%
ISAC.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

EEWD.L
4.5%
ISAC.L
4.4%

Energy

EEWD.L
4.2%
ISAC.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

EEWD.L
3.1%
ISAC.L
2.9%

Utilities

EEWD.L
2.6%
ISAC.L
2.2%

Real Estate

EEWD.L
2.2%
ISAC.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with EEWD.L:
EEWD.L vs. CHRG.LEEWD.L vs. INFR.LEEWD.L vs. CNDX.LEEWD.L vs. IGLN.LEEWD.L vs. IITU.LEEWD.L vs. IUIT.LEEWD.L vs. IWFV.L
Often compared with ISAC.L:
ISAC.L vs. VWRA.LISAC.L vs. SSAC.LISAC.L vs. IWDA.LISAC.L vs. VTISAC.L vs. SWDA.LISAC.L vs. VOOISAC.L vs. SWRD.L

Return for Risk

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EEWD.L
EEWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EEWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EEWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EEWD.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.05
2.38

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.08
3.50

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.36

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.09

14.09

-2.00

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEWD.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EEWD.LISAC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.38

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.73

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.80

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Drawdowns

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWD.L and ISAC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EEWD.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.48%

-33.82%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-8.77%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.00%

-16.56%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

-26.07%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.82%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.62%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.69%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.09%

-0.04%

Volatility

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) is 3.44%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that EEWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EEWD.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.83%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

9.77%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

12.42%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

15.57%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

15.95%

+1.39%

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EEWD.L and ISAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EEWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

EEWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EEWD.L
iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc		1.09%1.19%1.39%1.59%1.82%1.29%1.35%1.47%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.98, EEWD.L and ISAC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEWD.L and ISAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

EEWD.L tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEWD.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer