EEWD.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EEWD.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - EEWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EEWD.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 6.48%/yr for INFR.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EEWD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EEWD.L is traded in USD, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EEWD.L having a 9.23% return and INFR.L slightly higher at 9.25%.

EEWD.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 24.23%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

INFR.L

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 15.19%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc	9.23%	19.23%	18.35%	23.17%	-20.23%	22.70%	17.66%	15.77%
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	9.25%	13.90%	9.63%	0.06%	-5.54%	18.46%	-1.78%	11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EEWD.L and INFR.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between EEWD.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEWD.L	INFR.L
Technology	29.1%	0.7%
Financial Services	16.4%	0.0%
Industrials	10.4%	20.8%
Healthcare	9.3%	-
Communication Services	9.2%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	-
Energy	4.2%	16.4%
Basic Materials	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.6%	56.0%
Real Estate	2.2%	5.0%

Return for Risk

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEWD.L

EEWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
EEWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EEWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EEWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EEWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EEWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

INFR.L

INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EEWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.44	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.06	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.26	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.95	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.80	8.36	+3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEWD.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EEWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.44	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.47	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.32	+0.47

Drawdowns

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.48%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -48.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEWD.L and INFR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.48%	-48.40%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-5.13%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.00%	-14.58%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.90%	-21.88%	-6.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-3.68%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-9.57%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.81%	+0.24%

Volatility

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc (EEWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEWD.L	INFR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	3.57%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	8.67%	+0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	10.51%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.84%	13.70%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	14.79%	+2.54%

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEWD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEWD.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

EEWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than INFR.L's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEWD.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced CTB UCITS ETF USD Inc	1.09%	1.19%	1.39%	1.59%	1.82%	1.29%	1.35%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INFR.L iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.82%	2.97%	2.96%	3.02%	2.54%	2.60%	2.84%	2.70%	2.99%	3.51%	3.45%	4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEWD.L and INFR.L in my portfolio?

EEWD.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EEWD.L or INFR.L?

On fees, EEWD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEWD.L or INFR.L?

EEWD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

What is the main difference between EEWD.L and INFR.L?

EEWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. EEWD.L tracks MSCI World ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EEWD.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.