EEV vs. EEM
EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while EEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEV returned -21.72%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for EEM. Their -0.99 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EEV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
EEV vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEV achieves a -35.58% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 18.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EEV has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of -21.72%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
EEV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- -24.50%
- YTD
- -35.58%
- 1Y
- -50.55%
- 3Y*
- -30.58%
- 5Y*
- -15.56%
- 10Y*
- -21.72%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.41%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.57B | $1.56B | $1.92B | |
| $334.32K | $274.53K | $536.99K |
EEV vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -35.58% | -43.35% | -8.08% | -13.08% | 37.05% | -4.99% | -48.93% | -30.87% | 24.06% | -49.03% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 18.18% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEV and EEM is -0.99, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2007 | -0.99 |
The correlation between EEV and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEV vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEV
EEM
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EEV
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
EEV
EEM
Financial Services
EEV
EEM
Industrials
EEV
EEM
Basic Materials
EEV
EEM
Communication Services
EEV
EEM
Energy
EEV
EEM
Consumer Defensive
EEV
EEM
Healthcare
EEV
EEM
Utilities
EEV
EEM
Real Estate
EEV
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEV vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
EEV
EEM
EEV vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.28 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 2.54 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 7.75 | -9.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEV vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEV drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEV and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -66.43% | -33.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.73% | -14.24% | -43.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.51% | -17.29% | -60.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.14% | -35.01% | -46.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.39% | -39.82% | -53.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -9.68% | -90.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.04% | -15.95% | -77.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.15% | 4.67% | +30.48% |
Volatility
EEV vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a higher volatility of 19.06% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 9.04%. This indicates that EEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.06% | 9.04% | +10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.98% | 22.28% | +22.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.54% | 24.49% | +25.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.13% | 19.84% | +20.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.77% | 20.81% | +20.96% |
EEV vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEV vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than EEM's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.73% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.27% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEV and EEM have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEV has higher volatility (19.06%) compared to EEM (9.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEV dropped -99.88% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 8.14% vs -21.72% for EEV. On fees, EEM is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, EEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 8.14% return vs -21.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEM is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 1.73% for EEM.
EEV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Equities. EEV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-200%), while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EEV and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEV and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer