EETH vs. ZCSH
EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EETH is actively managed, while ZCSH is passively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -28.52% vs 1084.60% for ZCSH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.
Performance
EETH vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -36.80% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 49.20% return.
EETH
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -36.80%
- 6M
- -37.26%
- 1Y
- -28.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH
- 1D
- 15.08%
- 1M
- 75.10%
- YTD
- 49.20%
- 6M
- 98.43%
- 1Y
- 1,084.60%
- 3Y*
- 191.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EETH vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -36.80% | -17.19% | 33.29% | 35.44% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 49.20% | 446.78% | 96.92% | 64.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between EETH and ZCSH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EETH vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank
EETH
ZCSH
EETH vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EETH | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 6.61 | -7.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 4.20 | -4.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.50 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 15.67 | -16.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 30.75 | -31.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EETH | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 6.61 | -7.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.11 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EETH vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, smaller than the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and ZCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EETH | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -93.73% | +26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.71% | -69.62% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.06% | -11.00% | -51.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -74.46% | +45.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.55% | 35.47% | +3.08% |
Volatility
EETH vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) is 9.31%, while Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a volatility of 48.72%. This indicates that EETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EETH | ZCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.31% | 48.72% | -39.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.84% | 98.05% | -51.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.60% | 165.89% | -97.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 136.90% | -68.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.89% | 136.90% | -68.01% |
EETH vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EETH vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison
EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.06%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 84.06% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EETH and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (48.72%) compared to EETH (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -66.86% vs ZCSH's -93.73%.
On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 1084.60% vs -28.52% for EETH. On fees, EETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 1084.60% return vs -28.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 84.06%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EETH and 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.61 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EETH and ZCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer