EETH vs. EFU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU).

EETH and EFU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EETH is an actively managed fund by ProShares. It was launched on Oct 2, 2023. EFU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (-200%). It was launched on Oct 23, 2007.

Performance

EETH vs. EFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EETH vs. EFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	-28.59%	-17.19%	33.29%	35.44%
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE	-5.85%	-41.07%	-1.04%	-19.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -28.59% return, which is significantly lower than EFU's -5.85% return.

EETH

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 4.74%
• YTD: -28.59%
• 6M: -51.78%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFU

• 1D: -3.09%
• 1M: 8.38%
• YTD: -5.85%
• 6M: -11.25%
• 1Y: -35.75%
• 3Y*: -21.50%
• 5Y*: -15.41%
• 10Y*: -19.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EETH vs. EFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EETH and EFU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

EETH

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF

EFU

ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE

Return for Risk

EETH vs. EFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EETH

EETH Risk / Return Rank: 17
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 20
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 15

EFU

EFU Risk / Return Rank: 2
EFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
EFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EFU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EFU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EETH vs. EFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EETH	EFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	-1.01	+1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	-1.46	+2.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.82	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	-0.66	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	-0.89	+1.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EETH vs. EFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EETH Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is higher than the EFU Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EETH and EFU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EETH	EFU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	-1.01	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	-0.43	+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between EETH and EFU is -0.33. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

EETH vs. EFU - Dividend Comparison

EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.47%, more than EFU's 4.80% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	74.47%	56.98%	10.82%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFU ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE	4.80%	5.57%	3.87%	6.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.06%	0.95%	0.17%

Drawdowns

EETH vs. EFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, smaller than the maximum EFU drawdown of -99.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and EFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EETH	EFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.86%	-99.35%	+32.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.71%	-54.37%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-90.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.13%	-99.27%	+42.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-87.02%	+59.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.42%	40.37%	-8.95%

Volatility

EETH vs. EFU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 19.65% compared to ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE (EFU) at 15.09%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EETH	EFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.65%	15.09%	+4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.89%	22.36%	+31.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.25%	35.60%	+40.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.48%	32.89%	+37.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.48%	33.98%	+36.50%