EETH vs. BTRN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EETH is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, EETH returned -43.94% vs -25.19% for BTRN. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EETH vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EETH achieves a -41.54% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.56% return.

EETH

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 6.25%
• 6M: -43.87%
• YTD: -41.54%
• 1Y: -43.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTRN

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: -10.80%
• YTD: -10.56%
• 1Y: -25.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EETH vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	-41.54%	-17.19%	-6.87%
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.56%	4.89%	3.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EETH and BTRN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.60

The correlation between EETH and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EETH vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EETH

EETH Risk / Return Rank: 4
EETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
EETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
EETH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EETH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EETH vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EETH	BTRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.64	-1.44	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	-1.97	+1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.73	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	-0.96	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	-1.50	+0.50

EETH vs. BTRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is higher than the BTRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EETH and BTRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EETH vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EETH drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EETH and BTRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EETH	BTRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.22%	-36.97%	-32.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.22%	-26.45%	-42.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.90%	-26.34%	-38.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.86%	-14.90%	-15.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.15%	16.83%	+27.32%

Volatility

EETH vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 1.74%. This indicates that EETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EETH	BTRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.05%	1.74%	+14.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.07%	10.25%	+36.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.70%	17.60%	+51.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.77%	30.28%	+38.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.77%	30.28%	+38.49%

EETH vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EETH and BTRN have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EETH vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison

EETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.85%, more than BTRN's 31.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.39%	27.76%	2.56%	0.00%
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF	90.85%	56.98%	10.82%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EETH and BTRN in my portfolio?

EETH and BTRN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EETH or BTRN?

EETH has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to BTRN (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EETH dropped -69.22% vs BTRN's -36.97%.

Which ETF is better, EETH or BTRN?

On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -25.19% vs -43.94% for EETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EETH or BTRN?

Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -25.19% return vs -43.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EETH or BTRN?

EETH and BTRN have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EETH or BTRN?

EETH has the higher dividend yield at 90.85%, compared with 31.39% for BTRN.

What is the main difference between EETH and BTRN?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.