EEMV vs. GDX
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 7.04%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for GDX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
EEMV vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
GDX
- 1D
- 6.55%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 41.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
EEMV vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.58% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and GDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EEMV and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
GDX
EEMV vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 1.60 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.90 | 4.39 | +6.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -80.34% | +48.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -36.28% | +27.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -36.28% | +23.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -46.51% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -49.79% | +18.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -26.39% | +26.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -40.41% | +32.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 13.22% | -10.66% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) is 8.16%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 18.56%. This indicates that EEMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 18.56% | -10.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 39.52% | -26.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 47.30% | -32.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.22% | 36.86% | -24.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 37.37% | -23.38% |
EEMV vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMV vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and GDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to EEMV (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.81% vs 7.04% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
EEMV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
EEMV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDX is Gold. EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.51% for GDX.
EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer