EEMV vs. DEM
EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EEMV tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index while DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEMV returned 5.83%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEMV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
EEMV vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMV has underperformed DEM with an annualized return of 5.83%, while DEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
EEMV
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
DEM
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
EEMV vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 13.53% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 16.70% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | -5.84% | 19.84% | -7.69% | 26.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMV and DEM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EEMV and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
EEMV vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EEMV
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
EEMV
DEM
Financial Services
EEMV
DEM
Communication Services
EEMV
DEM
Industrials
EEMV
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
EEMV
DEM
Consumer Defensive
EEMV
DEM
Healthcare
EEMV
DEM
Utilities
EEMV
DEM
Energy
EEMV
DEM
Basic Materials
EEMV
DEM
Real Estate
EEMV
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMV vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
EEMV
DEM
EEMV vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMV | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.80 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 9.03 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMV vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMV | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.56% | -51.85% | +20.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -7.89% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.47% | -15.64% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -27.18% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -37.79% | +6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -3.87% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -12.84% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.45% | +0.27% |
Volatility
EEMV vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.76%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMV | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 5.76% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 13.00% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 14.73% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 15.57% | -3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 17.84% | -3.85% |
EEMV vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMV vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than DEM's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.19% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.25% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMV and DEM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to DEM (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 10-year performance, DEM leads with 9.22% vs 5.83% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 2.25% for EEMV.
EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMV and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer