PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMV vs. ADIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMV vs. ADIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMV achieves a 17.74% return, which is significantly higher than ADIV's 8.00% return.


EEMV

1D
-1.04%
1M
7.00%
YTD
17.74%
6M
18.90%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
6.68%

ADIV

1D
-1.20%
1M
4.12%
YTD
8.00%
6M
7.65%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMV vs. ADIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
17.74%13.45%7.98%7.75%-13.94%2.55%
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
8.00%21.86%14.47%12.28%-18.00%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMV and ADIV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.83

The correlation between EEMV and ADIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMV vs. ADIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMV
ADIV

Technology

28.9%
25.5%

Financial Services

17.7%
32.4%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.7%

Industrials

6.7%
2.4%

Healthcare

6.2%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
16.3%

Utilities

4.6%
2.5%

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Real Estate

0.5%
7.9%

Technology

EEMV
28.9%
ADIV
25.5%

Financial Services

EEMV
17.7%
ADIV
32.4%

Communication Services

EEMV
11.2%
ADIV
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEMV
6.8%
ADIV
4.7%

Industrials

EEMV
6.7%
ADIV
2.4%

Healthcare

EEMV
6.2%
ADIV
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMV
5.0%
ADIV
16.3%

Utilities

EEMV
4.6%
ADIV
2.5%

Energy

EEMV
3.4%
ADIV

-

Basic Materials

EEMV
3.1%
ADIV

-

Real Estate

EEMV
0.5%
ADIV
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMV vs. ADIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ADIV
ADIV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ADIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ADIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMV vs. ADIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMVADIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

1.43

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.03

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.89

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.79

6.27

+4.52

EEMV vs. ADIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the ADIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMV and ADIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMVADIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.43

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.42

-0.03

Drawdowns

EEMV vs. ADIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMV drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, roughly equal to the maximum ADIV drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMV and ADIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMVADIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-31.55%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-10.15%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

-18.53%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-31.55%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-1.20%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-8.45%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.06%

-0.59%

Volatility

EEMV vs. ADIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) at 4.35%. This indicates that EEMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMVADIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

4.35%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

10.54%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

13.49%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

16.48%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

16.37%

-2.51%

EEMV vs. ADIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ADIV's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMV vs. ADIV - Dividend Comparison

EEMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than ADIV's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
2.79%2.77%4.83%4.55%2.98%13.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.25%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMV and ADIV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMV has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to ADIV (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMV dropped -31.56% vs ADIV's -31.55%.

On 5-year performance, ADIV leads with 6.49% vs 5.59% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ADIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ADIV has performed better with a 6.49% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.

ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.25% for EEMV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EEMV and 0.78% for ADIV.

EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMV and ADIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer