PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMIX vs. BEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMIX achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 21.14% return.


EEMIX

1D
3.93%
1M
-1.82%
6M
8.58%
YTD
17.14%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.15%

BEMIX

1D
2.96%
1M
2.53%
6M
11.44%
YTD
21.14%
1Y
45.06%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EEMIX
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund
17.14%31.02%7.32%9.23%-22.37%-1.20%
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
21.14%47.83%4.01%22.53%-15.91%-2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMIX and BEMIX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021

0.86

The correlation between EEMIX and BEMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMIX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMIX
EEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BEMIX
BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMIXBEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.60

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

12.87

-5.03

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the BEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMIX and BEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMIX drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, smaller than the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMIX and BEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMIXBEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.14%

-46.05%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-12.07%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-16.08%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.08%

-32.88%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-3.70%

-4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-14.07%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

3.37%

+0.59%

Volatility

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) at 6.36%. This indicates that EEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMIXBEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

6.36%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

16.81%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.18%

18.95%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

16.99%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.17%

-0.64%

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMIX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison

EEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than BEMIX's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
1.90%2.15%3.04%2.45%2.86%2.31%1.31%2.56%1.55%1.41%2.20%1.54%
EEMIX
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund
1.62%1.90%1.47%3.00%1.19%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMIX and BEMIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMIX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to BEMIX (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMIX dropped -38.14% vs BEMIX's -46.05%.

BEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMIX and BEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer