EEMIX vs. MINIX
EEMIX (MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund) and MINIX (MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - EEMIX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by MFS, while MINIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, EEMIX returned 7.00%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for MINIX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EEMIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for MINIX.
Performance
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMIX achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than MINIX's 9.12% return.
EEMIX
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.15%
MINIX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMIX MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund | 17.14% | 31.02% | 7.32% | 9.23% | -22.37% | -1.20% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 9.12% | 33.06% | 7.35% | 18.04% | -23.05% | 15.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMIX and MINIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EEMIX and MINIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEMIX vs. MINIX — Risk / Return Rank
EEMIX
MINIX
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) and MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEMIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.70 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 5.60 | +2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMIX drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, smaller than the maximum MINIX drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMIX and MINIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.14% | -51.72% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -12.42% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.69% | -13.59% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | -36.78% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -0.61% | -7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -8.59% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.76% | +0.20% |
Volatility
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I (MINIX) at 3.96%. This indicates that EEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEMIX | MINIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 3.96% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.21% | 12.21% | +6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.18% | 14.65% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 16.79% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 15.52% | +1.01% |
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MINIX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
EEMIX vs. MINIX - Dividend Comparison
EEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than MINIX's 7.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMIX MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.47% | 3.00% | 1.19% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINIX MFS International Intrinsic Value Fund Class I | 7.12% | 7.77% | 12.02% | 11.21% | 13.90% | 7.25% | 5.25% | 3.94% | 4.49% | 2.62% | 1.82% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEMIX and MINIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMIX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to MINIX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMIX dropped -38.14% vs MINIX's -51.72%.
EEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEMIX and MINIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer