EEMIX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EEMIX (MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EEMIX returned 7.80%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EEMIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMIX achieves a 28.08% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 29.97% return.

EEMIX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 28.08%
• 6M: 29.22%
• 1Y: 51.68%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 7.80%
• 10Y*: —

FPADX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 31.22%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: 24.86%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EEMIX MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund	28.08%	31.02%	7.32%	9.23%	-22.37%	-1.20%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	29.97%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMIX and FPADX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021	0.90

The correlation between EEMIX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EEMIX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMIX

EEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
EEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEMIX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	2.78	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.46	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.53	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	4.22	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.50	15.86	-0.36

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMIX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMIX drawdown since its inception was -38.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FPADX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMIX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEMIX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.14%	-39.16%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-13.28%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.69%	-16.09%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.32%	-36.86%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-13.22%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	3.52%	-0.21%

Volatility

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund (EEMIX) is 8.76%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that EEMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEMIX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	10.85%	-2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	18.16%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.73%	20.17%	-2.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	17.63%	-1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	18.05%	-1.95%

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEMIX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

EEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMIX MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research Fund	1.48%	1.90%	1.47%	3.00%	1.19%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEMIX and FPADX in my portfolio?

EEMIX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEMIX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to EEMIX (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMIX dropped -38.14% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.