EEMD vs. EMIF
Compare and contrast key facts about AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF).
EEMD and EMIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMD is a passively managed fund by Advisors Asset Management that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. EMIF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2009. Both EEMD and EMIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EEMD vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EEMD vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.61% | 17.60% | -11.21% | 5.54% | -0.35% | 12.55% | -14.57% | 5.00% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 6.16% | 33.90% | 1.21% | 5.67% | -12.59% | 3.76% | -19.98% | 16.36% | -13.70% | 2.22% |
Returns By Period
EEMD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMIF
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMD vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EEMD vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank
EEMD
EMIF
EEMD vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF (EEMD) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EEMD | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.18 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between EEMD and EMIF is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EEMD vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison
EEMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMD AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.03% | 8.41% | 7.66% | 6.34% | 3.84% | 5.35% | 4.91% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.67% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
EEMD vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEMD | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -48.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -8.65% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.00% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
EEMD vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EEMD | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.67% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.61% | — |