PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 27.80% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


EEM

1D
-1.24%
1M
9.08%
YTD
27.80%
6M
30.51%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.93%

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
27.80%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%5.18%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%11.09%3.77%10.71%-16.96%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and UEVM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.90

The correlation between EEM and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
UEVM

Technology

43.6%
15.5%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
5.0%

Industrials

6.2%
8.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

5.7%
2.0%

Energy

3.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
5.5%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.4%

Utilities

2.0%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.8%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
UEVM
15.5%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
UEVM
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
UEVM
5.0%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
UEVM
8.7%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
UEVM
4.6%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
UEVM
2.0%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
UEVM
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
UEVM
5.5%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
UEVM
4.4%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
UEVM
4.1%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
UEVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.30

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.56

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

8.65

+7.33

EEM vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.65

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.48

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.33

+0.05

Drawdowns

EEM vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than UEVM's maximum drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-45.44%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-9.79%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-18.88%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-26.98%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-2.18%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-11.67%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.89%

+0.61%

Volatility

EEM vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

5.15%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.42%

12.13%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

15.18%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

15.90%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

18.39%

+2.11%

EEM vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.74%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and UEVM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 5-year performance, UEVM leads with 7.55% vs 7.01% for EEM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UEVM has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.74% for EEM.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.45% for UEVM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer