EEM vs. JNJ
EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EEM returned 8.20%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EEM vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 8.20%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.10% annualized return.
EEM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- YTD
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.85%
JNJ
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 55.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
EEM vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.78% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 21.57% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EEM and JNJ is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003 | 0.32 |
The correlation between EEM and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EEM vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
EEM
JNJ
EEM vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EEM | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.53 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 5.12 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 14.40 | -6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EEM vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EEM | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -50.67% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.52% | -10.96% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | -15.95% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -18.41% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.82% | -27.37% | -12.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.74% | -6.89% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -11.88% | -4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 3.89% | +0.29% |
Volatility
EEM vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 9.47%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EEM | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.06% | 9.47% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | 14.38% | +7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 18.08% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 17.34% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 18.70% | +2.02% |
Dividends
EEM vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than JNJ's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.11% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EEM and JNJ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to JNJ (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EEM and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer