EEM vs. IJR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while IJR is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EEM returned 8.14%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for IJR. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.

Performance

EEM vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 23.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 8.14%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.

EEM

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -2.10%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 1Y: 36.06%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 6.64%
• 10Y*: 8.14%
• ALL TIME*: 9.89%

IJR

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 0.94%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 23.60%
• 1Y: 38.11%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 10.83%
• ALL TIME*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	$1.57B	$1.56B	$1.92B
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	$497.97M	$462.30M	$544.01M

EEM vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.18%	33.98%	6.49%	8.95%	-20.56%	-3.63%	17.02%	18.22%	-15.31%	37.26%
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	23.60%	5.89%	8.63%	16.06%	-16.20%	26.58%	11.28%	22.82%	-8.51%	13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and IJR is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003	0.67

The correlation between EEM and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEM vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EEM	IJR
Technology	45.9%	15.5%
Financial Services	18.2%	17.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	13.2%
Industrials	6.2%	15.6%
Communication Services	6.0%	3.2%
Basic Materials	5.4%	4.7%
Energy	3.2%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.2%
Healthcare	2.5%	12.4%
Utilities	1.8%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	7.6%

Return for Risk

EEM vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEM

EEM Risk / Return Rank: 64
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IJR

IJR Risk / Return Rank: 90
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEM vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEM	IJR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.22	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.22	-1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.38	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	4.41	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	15.06	-7.31

EEM vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEM vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and IJR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEM	IJR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.43%	-58.15%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.24%	-8.68%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.29%	-28.02%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.01%	-28.02%	-6.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.82%	-44.36%	+4.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.68%	-0.30%	-9.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.95%	-9.23%	-6.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	2.54%	+2.13%

Volatility

EEM vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 3.73%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEM	IJR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.04%	3.73%	+5.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.28%	11.70%	+10.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.49%	17.30%	+7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.84%	21.26%	-1.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.81%	22.86%	-2.05%

EEM vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEM vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than IJR's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	1.73%	2.22%	2.43%	2.63%	2.50%	1.99%	1.45%	2.76%	2.24%	1.89%	1.89%	2.49%
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	1.11%	1.44%	2.05%	1.31%	1.41%	1.53%	1.11%	1.44%	1.58%	1.20%	1.22%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEM and IJR in my portfolio?

EEM and IJR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEM or IJR?

EEM has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to IJR (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs IJR's -58.15%.

Which ETF is better, EEM or IJR?

On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.83% vs 8.14% for EEM. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EEM or IJR?

Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EEM or IJR?

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EEM or IJR?

EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.11% for IJR.

What is the main difference between EEM and IJR?

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IJR is Small Cap Blend Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.06% for IJR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.