PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEM vs. IHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEM vs. IHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEM achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly higher than IHDG's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EEM has underperformed IHDG with an annualized return of 9.91%, while IHDG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.


EEM

1D
0.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
24.07%
6M
26.94%
1Y
45.22%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
9.91%

IHDG

1D
0.48%
1M
3.68%
YTD
7.08%
6M
8.20%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEM vs. IHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
24.07%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
7.08%14.17%5.97%20.00%-11.53%19.75%10.51%33.42%-12.03%21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EEM and IHDG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2014

0.66

The correlation between EEM and IHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEM vs. IHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEM
IHDG

Technology

43.6%
7.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
19.3%

Industrials

6.2%
19.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
5.4%

Communication Services

5.7%
4.5%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
9.4%

Utilities

2.0%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.3%

Technology

EEM
43.6%
IHDG
7.8%

Financial Services

EEM
17.5%
IHDG
15.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EEM
8.1%
IHDG
19.3%

Industrials

EEM
6.2%
IHDG
19.7%

Basic Materials

EEM
6.1%
IHDG
5.4%

Communication Services

EEM
5.7%
IHDG
4.5%

Energy

EEM
3.3%
IHDG
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

EEM
2.7%
IHDG
4.3%

Healthcare

EEM
2.5%
IHDG
9.4%

Utilities

EEM
2.0%
IHDG
0.8%

Real Estate

EEM
0.9%
IHDG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEM vs. IHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IHDG
IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEM vs. IHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMIHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.53

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.38

5.68

+6.71

EEM vs. IHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the IHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEM and IHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEM vs. IHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEM drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than IHDG's maximum drawdown of -29.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEM and IHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMIHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.43%

-29.24%

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.52%

-10.49%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-18.88%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.49%

-19.52%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.82%

-29.24%

-10.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

0.00%

-4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-4.03%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

2.84%

+0.83%

Volatility

EEM vs. IHDG - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a higher volatility of 10.80% compared to WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) at 4.87%. This indicates that EEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMIHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.80%

4.87%

+5.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.39%

11.77%

+7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

14.04%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

14.91%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

15.78%

+4.86%

EEM vs. IHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IHDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEM vs. IHDG - Dividend Comparison

EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, which matches IHDG's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.79%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
1.79%1.84%2.42%1.70%13.79%2.77%1.94%1.99%0.22%1.28%1.91%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEM and IHDG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEM has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to IHDG (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEM dropped -66.43% vs IHDG's -29.24%.

On 10-year performance, IHDG leads with 10.80% vs 9.91% for EEM. On fees, IHDG is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IHDG has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IHDG has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHDG is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

EEM and IHDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.79%.

EEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IHDG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net), while IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for EEM and 0.58% for IHDG.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEM and IHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer