EELV vs. LVHI
EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - EELV tracks the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index while LVHI tracks the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EELV returned 6.60%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for LVHI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EELV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
EELV vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.03% return.
EELV
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
EELV vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 2.91% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -3.98% | 16.15% | -3.89% | 8.89% | -5.40% | 24.89% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.03% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EELV and LVHI is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.51 |
The correlation between EELV and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
EELV vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EELV
LVHI
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
EELV
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
EELV
LVHI
Communication Services
EELV
LVHI
Utilities
EELV
LVHI
Industrials
EELV
LVHI
Energy
EELV
LVHI
Healthcare
EELV
LVHI
Basic Materials
EELV
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
EELV
LVHI
Real Estate
EELV
LVHI
Technology
EELV
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EELV vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
EELV
LVHI
EELV vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EELV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.59 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 4.90 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 20.31 | -15.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EELV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 3.14 | -1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 1.42 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
EELV vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EELV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -32.31% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -6.08% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.79% | -11.99% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -11.99% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.69% | -2.16% | -3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -3.52% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 1.46% | +1.00% |
Volatility
EELV vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.91%. This indicates that EELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EELV | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.91% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 7.57% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 9.49% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.38% | 11.06% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 13.76% | -0.11% |
EELV vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EELV vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than LVHI's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.64% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.80% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EELV and LVHI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EELV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to LVHI (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 6.60% for EELV. On fees, EELV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 6.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EELV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 3.64% for EELV.
EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EELV and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer