EELV vs. BITI
EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EELV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EELV returned 10.14%/yr vs -31.71%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. EELV charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
EELV vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EELV achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.
EELV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 1Y
- 12.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
BITI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 36.51%
- YTD
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 64.56%
- 3Y*
- -31.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EELV vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 5.64% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -0.04% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 24.73% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between EELV and BITI is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EELV vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
EELV
BITI
EELV vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EELV | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.57 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 6.36 | -1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EELV vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EELV drawdown since its inception was -36.35%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EELV and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EELV | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -92.16% | +55.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.22% | -25.28% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.79% | -84.63% | +72.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -86.38% | +83.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -68.42% | +59.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 10.18% | -7.44% |
Volatility
EELV vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) is 2.50%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that EELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EELV | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 10.69% | -8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 34.09% | -24.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 44.07% | -33.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 52.21% | -40.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 52.21% | -38.74% |
EELV vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EELV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EELV vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
EELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than BITI's 15.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.59% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.89% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EELV and BITI have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to EELV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EELV dropped -36.35% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, EELV leads with 10.14% vs -31.71% for BITI. On fees, EELV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EELV has performed better with a 10.14% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EELV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 3.89% for EELV.
EELV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. EELV tracks S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EELV and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EELV and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer