PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEIAX vs. DBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIAX achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than DBLEX's 1.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EEIAX has outperformed DBLEX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while DBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.82% annualized return.


EEIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.00%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
4.94%

DBLEX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
4.30%23.43%-1.23%13.63%-11.99%-7.64%4.68%22.66%-8.38%16.10%
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
1.72%8.39%8.20%9.64%-15.30%1.97%4.85%11.80%-3.20%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIAX and DBLEX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEIAX vs. DBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLEX
DBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEIAXDBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.68

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.41

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

13.91

-5.72

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the DBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIAX and DBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIAX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than DBLEX's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIAX and DBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEIAXDBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-25.43%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-1.81%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-4.54%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-25.43%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-25.43%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.11%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-3.47%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.44%

+1.62%

Volatility

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) at 0.55%. This indicates that EEIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEIAXDBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

0.55%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.44%

1.57%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

2.09%

+5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

4.52%

+3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

4.64%

+3.77%

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLEX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEIAX vs. DBLEX - Dividend Comparison

EEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than DBLEX's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
5.56%5.59%5.97%5.54%4.77%4.00%4.37%4.57%3.83%4.33%4.54%5.21%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
9.94%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEIAX and DBLEX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEIAX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to DBLEX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEIAX dropped -31.70% vs DBLEX's -25.43%.

DBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEIAX and DBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer