PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBLEX vs. AMAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLEX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLEX has outperformed AMAPX with an annualized return of 3.42%, while AMAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.96% annualized return.


DBLEX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.56%
6M
0.28%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
3.42%
ALL TIME*
4.20%

AMAPX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-0.46%
YTD
-0.22%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
1.96%
ALL TIME*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
1.00%8.39%8.20%9.64%-15.30%1.97%4.85%11.80%-3.20%8.48%
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
-0.22%5.98%3.77%2.09%-5.27%0.49%5.35%6.61%0.08%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLEX and AMAPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.49

The correlation between DBLEX and AMAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBLEX vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBLEX
DBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAPX
AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBLEXAMAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.07

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

3.26

+5.08

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the AMAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLEX and AMAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLEX drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLEX and AMAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBLEXAMAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-7.75%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.81%

-2.51%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-2.51%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-7.75%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-7.75%

-17.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.08%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-1.55%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.82%

-0.35%

Volatility

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) at 0.43%. This indicates that DBLEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBLEXAMAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.43%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

2.05%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

2.23%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.51%

2.19%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

1.99%

+2.65%

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLEX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBLEX vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison

DBLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than AMAPX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
3.46%3.52%3.15%2.25%1.30%1.55%1.95%2.45%2.62%2.14%2.14%0.00%
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
5.11%5.59%5.97%5.54%4.77%4.00%4.37%4.57%3.83%4.33%4.54%5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBLEX and AMAPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBLEX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to AMAPX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLEX dropped -25.43% vs AMAPX's -7.75%.

DBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBLEX and AMAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer