EDZ vs. TERG
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG).
EDZ and TERG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDZ is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (-300%). It was launched on Dec 17, 2008. TERG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Nov 17, 2025.
Performance
EDZ vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDZ vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | -16.24% | -5.21% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 102.79% | 28.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDZ achieves a -16.24% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 102.79% return.
EDZ
- 1D
- -10.95%
- 1M
- 26.71%
- YTD
- -16.24%
- 6M
- -25.08%
- 1Y
- -61.49%
- 3Y*
- -35.39%
- 5Y*
- -16.80%
- 10Y*
- -32.46%
TERG
- 1D
- 14.40%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- 102.79%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDZ vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDZ has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDZ vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
EDZ
TERG
EDZ vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares (EDZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDZ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDZ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 10.56 | -11.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDZ and TERG is -0.72. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EDZ vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
EDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDZ Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bear 3X Shares | 5.27% | 6.58% | 4.87% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.68% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EDZ vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDZ drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDZ and TERG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDZ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -39.32% | -60.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -30.58% | -69.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.71% | -9.77% | -87.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.30% | — | — |
Volatility
EDZ vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDZ | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.73% | 124.59% | -63.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 124.59% | -68.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 124.59% | -64.13% |