PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EDV vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EDV vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EDV achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, EDV has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of -3.45%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.


EDV

1D
1.93%
1M
2.59%
YTD
0.40%
6M
-1.16%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
-5.03%
5Y*
-10.20%
10Y*
-3.45%

SPEM

1D
2.36%
1M
0.16%
YTD
10.36%
6M
11.13%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDV vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
0.40%0.65%-12.78%1.65%-39.15%-6.19%23.59%18.67%-3.40%13.94%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
10.36%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EDV and SPEM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

-0.21

The correlation between EDV and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EDV vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDV
EDV Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDV vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EDVSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.28

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.19

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

7.82

-7.09

EDV vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EDV and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EDV vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDV drawdown since its inception was -59.96%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDV and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EDVSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.96%

-64.41%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-11.36%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.99%

-17.62%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.03%

-31.75%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

-36.06%

-23.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.94%

-3.24%

-50.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-14.73%

-8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

3.17%

+2.36%

Volatility

EDV vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is 4.21%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that EDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EDVSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

6.93%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

14.21%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

16.65%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

17.26%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

18.84%

+0.98%

EDV vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EDV vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

EDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than SPEM's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
4.93%4.94%4.65%3.81%3.28%1.95%5.54%3.51%2.90%2.92%5.32%4.24%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.51%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EDV and SPEM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to EDV (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EDV dropped -59.96% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.52% vs -3.45% for EDV. On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.52% return vs -3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SPEM.

EDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 2.51% for SPEM.

EDV is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for EDV and 0.11% for SPEM.

SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EDV and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer